Product-market regulation, entry barriers, licensing burdens, network-industry regulation, price controls.
Trade policy openness — tariffs, non-tariff barriers, FTAs, industrial protection.
Targeted industrial and sectoral subsidies (renewable energy, chip manufacturing, agriculture, green hydrogen, etc).
De jure and de facto independence of the central bank from fiscal authority. Per D.1.5 scope, one of the framework's defensible monetary positions.
Under acting PM Yegor Gaidar advised by Jeffrey Sachs and Anders Åslund. Price liberalisation (Jan 2 1992, ~90% of consumer prices freed overnight), fiscal tightening attempt (undermined by CBR monetary accommodation), unification of exchange rates, trade liberalisation, start of mass privatisation via voucher scheme. Produced sharp inflation (peak ~2500% annualised late 1992) and GDP collapse through 1998. Often cited as failed shock therapy; Sachs-Åslund et al argue the fiscal tightening was never actually implemented, so the shock therapy framework isn't what was tested. Canonical contested post-Soviet case. Later Putin-era stabilisation (2000-2008) benefitted from oil-price rebound atop the stabilised macro framework.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.