IESET.
Hypotheses·labour·labour_reform_canada_1990s_ui_reform_nairu

Canada's 1990-1996 unemployment-insurance reforms (1990 Bill C-21 entrance-requirement tightening, 1996 EI Act with hours-based eligibility and intensity rule) lowered the Canadian NAIRU by at least 1.5 pp by 2000 relative to a synthetic control of OECD peers, with the largest gains in high-frequent-claimant regions (Atlantic provinces).

REFUTEDengine/runs/labour_reform_canada_1990s_ui_reform_nairu

REFUTED - Canadian unemployment is above the synthetic control through 2000

confidence cueThis test cuts against the claim as written or misses its pre-declared threshold.

policy briefNeeds review

In ordinary language

In plain terms, this asks whether canada ui ei reform is actually linked to better or worse unemployment rate from 1985 to 2002.

plain answer

The data did not support the prediction. Canadian unemployment is above the synthetic control through 2000

why it matters

Labor-market rules often help some workers while risking job loss or slower hiring for others. This test looks for that tradeoff in observable employment or unemployment data.

how the test works

It compares 7 country or place units from 1985 to 2002, using a synth did design, with fixed effects for country and year.

what was measured
What changed
  • Canada ui ei reform
What we checked
  • Unemployment rate
  • Nairu imf estimate
  • Long term unemployment share
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

0 input datasets, 0 unresolved missing series, provenance status: no input vintages recorded.

Results

engine/runs/labour_reform_canada_1990s_ui_reform_nairu
1007550250198519942002CANUSAGBRAUSFRADEUNLD
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show unemployment_rate across 7 sampled countries over 19852002.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for labour_reform_canada_1990s_ui_reform_nairu. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/labour_reform_canada_1990s_ui_reform_nairu/chart_data.json.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit 098ce96 · 2026-04-30T12:57:33Z
run generated · 2026-05-17T18:10:06Z

Canada's 1990-1996 unemployment-insurance reforms (1990 Bill C-21 entrance-requirement tightening, 1996 EI Act with hours-based eligibility and intensity rule) lowered the Canadian NAIRU by at least 1.5 pp by 2000 relative to a synthetic control of OECD peers, with the largest gains in high-frequent-claimant regions (Atlantic provinces).

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

SUPPORTED if synth-DiD gap on Canadian NAIRU < -1.5 pp by 2000 (estimated as Hodrick-Prescott-trended unemployment rate as proxy) AND the gap is concentrated in Atlantic provinces. REFUTED if NAIRU gap is insignificant OR distributed evenly across provinces (no region-heterogeneity consistent with frequent-claimant story).

formal test & threshold
test:      Synth-DiD on Canadian unemployment rate (HP-trended) 1990- 2000 vs OECD donor pool with US-cycle control, plus province- level event study; placebo permutation at p<0.10.

Method

Template
synth_did
Fixed effects
country, year
Clustering
country
Sample
7 countries · 19852002
Evidence type
associational

Data

VariableSourceTransform
unemployment_rate
outcome
world_bank_wdi:SL.UEM.TOTL.ZStier 2
level
nairu_imf_estimate
outcome
imf:NAIRUtier 2
level
long_term_unemployment_share
outcome
oecd:DSD_LFStier 2
level
canada_ui_ei_reform
treatment
constructed:indicator for 1990-Q4 (Bill C-21) then 1996-Q3 (EI Act) intensificationtier 5
indicator
us_unemployment_rate
control
fred:UNRATEtier 1
level
gdp_per_capita_real
control
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2
log
trade_openness
control
world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2
level

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

Result card - labour_reform_canada_1990s_ui_reform_nairu

Verdict: REFUTED - Canadian unemployment is above the synthetic control through 2000

JST Synthetic-Control Benchmark

  • Donor weights: USA=0.917, NLD=0.083.
  • Mean 1990-2000 unemployment gap: 3.67 pp.
  • End-2000 unemployment gap: 2.94 pp.
  • Placebo p-value: 0.143.

The registered regional heterogeneity leg remains unavailable locally, so this is a national unemployment benchmark.

Generated by engine/runs/labour_reform_canada_1990s_ui_reform_nairu/replication.py at 2026-05-17T18:10:06+00:00

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

Treatment dated 1990-Q4 then intensified 1996-Q3. The 1990s Canadian NAIRU debate (Fortin, Setterfield) makes Canada a testbed case for whether UI reform shifts the structural unemployment rate. Region-heterogeneity spec captures the Atlantic-Canada concentration of frequent-claimant behaviour.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.