Pre-registration
Developmentalist catch-up growth premiums are strongest before countries reach roughly 40 percent of US GDP per capita, but the premium fades or reverses after that middle-income threshold unless market competition and rule-bound institutions strengthen.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if developmentalist intensity is positive below 40 percent of US income but statistically weaker, zero, or negative above that threshold, and market-institution strength is positive above the threshold. REFUTED if developmentalist intensity remains equally positive above the threshold while market institutions add no positive signal. Otherwise PARTIAL.
formal test & threshold
test: catch_up_threshold_interaction_panel threshold: [object Object]
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 23 countries · 1960 – 2024
- Evidence type
- associational
Interaction model between developmentalist intensity and below/above 40 percent US income threshold.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
five_year_gdp_pc_growth outcome | pwt:rgdpo_poptier 3 world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZGtier 2 | rolling five-year annualized growth |
developmentalist_policy_intensity treatment | movement_position_alignments:developmentalismtier 5 vdem:state_ownershiptier 4 world_bank_wdi:industrial_policy_proxytier 2 | coded developmentalist alignment and state-allocation proxy |
market_institution_strength treatment | fraser_efw:summary_indextier 4 wgi:rule_of_lawtier 4 | standardized score |
income_threshold control | pwt:rgdpo_poptier 3 | country GDP per capita as share of US GDP per capita |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — catch_up_growth_fades_after_middle_income_threshold
Verdict: SUPPORTED — coef=+1.288 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0312
Pre-registration
- Claim: Developmentalist catch-up growth premiums are strongest before countries reach roughly 40 percent of US GDP per capita, but the premium fades or reverses after that middle-income threshold unless market competition and rule-bound institutions strengthen.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if developmentalist intensity is positive below 40 percent of US income but statistically weaker, zero, or negative above that threshold, and market-institution strength is positive above the threshold. REFUTED if developmentalist intensity remains equally positive above the threshold while market institutions add no positive signal. Otherwise PARTIAL.
- Falsification test: catch_up_threshold_interaction_panel
Estimate
- Method: linearmodels.PanelOLS
- Coefficient (treatment): +1.288
- Std error: 0.5961
- p-value: 0.0312
- Observations: 584, countries: 23
- Within R²: -0.0911
- Fixed effects: entity=True, time=True
- Clustering: country
Variables resolved
pwt:rgdpo_pop; world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG→ five_year_gdp_pc_growth (outcome, publisher=pwt, n=10399)fraser_efw:summary_index; wgi:rule_of_law→ market_institution_strength (treatment, publisher=fraser_efw, n=4557)pwt:rgdpo_pop→ income_threshold (controls, publisher=pwt, n=10399)
Variables missing data
movement_position_alignments:developmentalism; vdem:state_ownership; world_bank:industrial_policy_proxy(treatment, name=developmentalist_policy_intensity) — vintage not on disk
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:52:44+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.